[iaufwg] convention or standard

[Mark Calabretta]

On Thu 2006/10/12 14:38:51 -0400, William Pence wrote
in a message to: iaufwg at donar.cv.nrao.edu

>It might be argued that this is a misuse of the IMAGE extension since the 
>data are not an image in the usual sense of the word, but my own feeling is 

I would argue that way, but wouldn't it be more natural to put the byte
stream in a 1-row, 1-column BINTABLE as a byte-array (or even bit-array).

Cheers, Mark