[iaufwg] approval of the 'FOREIGN' extension convention

[Mark Calabretta]

On Fri 2007/02/02 12:15:14 CDT, William Pence wrote
in a message to: IAU-FWG <iaufwg at nrao.edu>

Bill,

>investing a lot more effort.  The original authors of this convention 
>don't have much motivation to try to clarify the issues you raised 
>(partly because this convention is not used very much) and even if they 
>did, they may not agree on the best solution.   Even with these 

I thought the idea was that the documentation was to be checked for
correctness and completeness.  But now you appear to be saying that
deficiencies are not worth rectifying.  So what is the point of putting
these documents up for discussion?

Cheers, Mark