[iaufwg] IAUFWG review of the new draft FITS Standard

[Steve Allen]

On Mon 2008-03-17T21:24:17 +0100, Andreas Wicenec hath writ:
> Just saw your latest e-mail: Since we do have this Y2K agreement (I
> forgot about this),
> why shouldn't we put it into the standard?

The reference to ISO is is implicit in the requirements of 4.4.2.1,
but only explicit in the body of ref 10.

--
Steve Allen                 <sla at ucolick.org>                WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory        Natural Sciences II, Room 165    Lat  +36.99855
University of California    Voice: +1 831 459 3046           Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064        http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/     Hgt +250 m