[iaufwg] IAUFWG review of the new draft FITS Standard

[Arnold Rots]

I meant as a datatype, allowed in tables (rather than faking it as a string).
And, yes, ISO 8601 as restricted by the Y2K agreement.

  - Arnold

Steve Allen wrote:
> On Mon 2008-03-17T21:24:17 +0100, Andreas Wicenec hath writ:
> > Just saw your latest e-mail: Since we do have this Y2K agreement (I
> > forgot about this),
> > why shouldn't we put it into the standard?
> 
> The reference to ISO is is implicit in the requirements of 4.4.2.1,
> but only explicit in the body of ref 10.
> 
> --
> Steve Allen                 <sla at ucolick.org>                WGS-84 (GPS)
> UCO/Lick Observatory        Natural Sciences II, Room 165    Lat  +36.99855
> University of California    Voice: +1 831 459 3046           Lng -122.06015
> Santa Cruz, CA 95064        http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/     Hgt +250 m
> _______________________________________________
> iaufwg mailing list
> iaufwg at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/iaufwg
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnold H. Rots                                Chandra X-ray Science Center
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory                tel:  +1 617 496 7701
60 Garden Street, MS 67                              fax:  +1 617 495 7356
Cambridge, MA 02138                             arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
USA                                     http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------